plac.com
plac.com Profile
plac.com
Sub Domains:placconnect.plac.com
Title:
Description:Skip to main content Contact Home Toggle search Keyword search Sign in Toggle navigation Keyword search Legal Protection and Reasonable Treatment for Corporations Throughout the Entire Product Life Cy
Discover plac.com website stats, rating, details and status online.Use our online tools to find owner and admin contact info. Find out where is server located.Read and write reviews or vote to improve it ranking. Check alliedvsaxis duplicates with related css, domain relations, most used words, social networks references. Go to regular site
plac.com Information
Website / Domain: |
plac.com |
HomePage size: | 90.902 KB |
Page Load Time: | 0.282038 Seconds |
Website IP Address: |
52.146.49.236 |
Isp Server: |
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. Inc. |
plac.com Ip Information
Ip Country: |
United States |
City Name: |
Wilmington |
Latitude: |
39.749801635742 |
Longitude: |
-75.554298400879 |
plac.com Keywords accounting
plac.com Httpheader
Cache-Control: no-cache |
Pragma: no-cache |
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 |
Expires: -1 |
Server: |
Set-Cookie: ASP.NET_SessionId=keat3rmmcbb2cvk0laxdtmjk; path=/; secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax, ASP.NET_SessionId=keat3rmmcbb2cvk0laxdtmjk; path=/; secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax, __RequestVerificationToken=vga0va937enZdD9vh4r0OeYOt89B7pRg2jduFKEY7X4EZA52BnE_j61KASxYroB_3P3nPXPafye0X7ZzEfONrvFlstZExr0EbqxeXU3NABc1; path=/; secure; HttpOnly |
X-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319 |
Content-Security-Policy: "frame-ancestors self", X-Frames-Options: sameorigin |
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff |
X-Frame-Options: sameorigin |
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000 |
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 22:16:59 GMT |
Content-Length: 77893 |
plac.com Meta Info
52.146.49.236 Domains
plac.com Similar Website
plac.com Traffic Sources Chart
plac.com Alexa Rank History Chart
plac.com Html To Plain Text
Skip to main content Contact Home Toggle search Keyword search Sign in Toggle navigation Keyword search Legal Protection and Reasonable Treatment for Corporations Throughout the Entire Product Life Cycle Welcome New Members Francis J. Grey, Jr. Ricci Tyrrell Johnson & Grey Carl Rowley Thompson Coburn LLP Thomas P. Branigan Bowman and Brooke LLP Gregory C. Ulmer BakerHostler News January 22, 2021 Member Ted Boutrous Named Top Lawyer of the Decade by Daily Journal Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Click here to read the full article We are pleased to share with you the current version of the Doing Business In Brazil, drafted by Souto Correa Advogados , a full service law firm in Brazil. Please reach out to member Roberta Feiten with questions or if you would like more information. “What Real Jurors Like/Dislike About Lawyers” As courts are slowly resuming proceedings including some forms of jury trials, trial counsel, their trial teams, litigators generally and claims supervisors need to recalibrate their thinking about jurors. 30(b)(6) Discovery in the Age of COVID-19 Defending corporate representative depositions in the new reality. J. Richard Caldwell, Jr. If there is one lesson all trial lawyers have learned over the last year, it’s that life and the practice of law must go on, even in the face of upheavals affecting our profession. Depositions of corporate representative witnesses under Rule 30(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is a prime example of how lawyers must learn to adapt to changing times and circumstances. To read the full article, click here. J. Richard Caldwell, Jr. Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A. Dick Caldwell is a founding member of , and an active contributor to our Future of Jury Trials working group. Dick is also a founding partner of Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A., where he is currently Of Counsel in the firm’s Tampa, FL office. He was one of the first attorneys in Florida to become board-certified in Civil Trial Practice. Dick is engaged in civil trial and appellate practice, concentrating in the defense of product liability, insurance, professional liability, and commercial litigation. He has tried over 100 cases to verdict in state and federal courts across the country, and is a frequent author and presenter on the subject of products liability and other topics. Featured Amicus Brief On February 16, 2021, and the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association filed a brief in the US Supreme Court supporting the cert petition filed by Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Robert Bosch LLC in Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County , S. Ct. No. 20-994. The case concerns preemption under the federal Clean Air Act of state and local government regulation of manufacturers’ post-sale, nationwide updates to vehicle emission software systems. ’s brief asks the Supreme Court to grant certiorari and hold that the Act does preempt such state and local regulation. The brief highlights the vital role that the auto industry plays in the U.S. economy and the sheer number of post-sale updates to vehicle emissions systems manufacturers make every year. It further explains that allowing the Ninth Circuit’s decision to stand would permit a patchwork of emissions regulations across the country, lead to massive litigation, and increase costs for manufacturers and consumers. The Supreme Court called for a response to the petition, which is due on March 18. Nicole A. Saharsky of Mayer Brown LLP and her colleague Eric A. White authored the brief. Nicole A. Saharsky Mayer Brown Eric A. White Mayer Brown On February 8, 2021, filed a brief in the United States Supreme Court in Trans Union LLC v Sergio L Ramirez addressing the issue of whether either Article III or Rule 23 permits a damages class action where the vast majority of the class suffered no actual injury, let alone an injury anything like what the class representative suffered. The Court granted review of a Ninth Circuit decision approving certification of a class of consumers who were provided copies of credit reports from Trans Union identifying the consumers as potential terrorists. Most of the reports had never been disclosed to anyone except the consumer, but the Named Plaintiff was denied credit in a public setting based on the incorrect information, and he cancelled a trip to Mexico out of fear he would be detained as a terrorist. As required by the trial court’s instructions, the jury awarded the same amount of damages to each class member. In the Supreme Court, argues that the Ninth Circuit erred by holding that every class member had standing, and that the Named Plaintiff was typical of the class, simply because there was a “material risk” for all class members that the credit reports might one day be disclosed. Rather, a threatened injury must be “certainly impending” to constitute an injury in fact. also argues that the Ninth Circuit erred by adopting a “least common denominator” approach to class certification, under which the typicality requirement is satisfied as long as at least one injury common to the class can be identified - in this case, the mere existence of inaccurate information in a credit report. This approach either denies due process to the defendant (because it is denied the opportunity to litigate the damage claims of less severely injured class members) or to class members (who are denied the opportunity to show they are more severely injured than the class representative). Besides, the issue of damages plainly was not common. If the absence of a class-wide measure of damages did not preclude class certification under Comcast, it at least required that damages be tried separately. Oral argument is scheduled for March 30, 2021. ’s brief was authored by John M. Thomas of Dykema Gossett PLLC. John M. Thomas Dykema Gossett PLLC Our Mission is a specialty bar association focusing on complex litigation and regulatory issues in the area of product development and product liability. Our not-for-profit association of product manufacturers, suppliers, retailers and select regulatory, litigation and appellate professionals who work to shape the common law of product liability and complex regulation, provide guidance on changing regulations, and strategically help corporations manage risk throughout the entire product lifecycle. is a unique resource for companies who must defend their products’ integrity and their companies’ reputation. 2021 Sponsors Amicus Program 's mission is to obtain fairness and balance in the common law of product liability. A primary tool to accomplish this mission is 's Amicus Curiae Program, often called “The heart and soul of .” has filed more than 1,100 amicus briefs, written by some of the nation’s top appellate practitioners. Our briefs have been accepted in virtually every state and federal court in the U.S. They are routinely acknowledged, quoted, and praised by courts in published opinions. ’s amicus briefs help shape the law for all manufacturers on important issues. Click here to learn more about ’s Amicus Program or to submit a request for amicus support. Upcoming Events Fall 2021 Conference: 's Fall Conference will be held at the Broadmoor, September 29-October 1, 2021 in Colorado Springs, CO. Webinars: March 21, 2021 at 2:00 PM ET: Protecting Fair Jury Trials: Partaker vs. Hyundai Motor America April 13, 2021 at 2:00 PM ET: Regulatory Series: CPSC April 15, 2021 at 2:00 PM ET: Regulatory Series: EPA April 20, 2021 at 2:00 PM ET: Regulatory Series: FDA April 22, 2021 at 2:00 PM ET: Regulatory Series: NHTSA Questions? Email us at plac@plac.com . Preserving Fair Trial Rights in the Time of COVID and Beyond “As courts around the country begin to open back up, judges are facing increasing pressure to get through the backlog of cases caused by pandemic-related shutdowns. To do so, many courts are relying on reforms that were hastily adopted...
plac.com Whois
"domain_name": "PLAC.COM",
"registrar": "Network Solutions, LLC",
"whois_server": "whois.networksolutions.com",
"referral_url": null,
"updated_date": "2015-01-28 20:23:45",
"creation_date": "1997-05-12 04:00:00",
"expiration_date": "2024-05-13 04:00:00",
"name_servers": [
"NS15.WORLDNIC.COM",
"NS16.WORLDNIC.COM"
],
"status": "clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited",
"emails": "abuse@web.com",
"dnssec": "unsigned",
"name": null,
"org": null,
"address": null,
"city": null,
"state": null,
"zipcode": null,
"country": null